Only the US and Switzerland effectively enforce their Anti-Corruption Laws Abroad

July 31, 2023

Several countries have anti-corruption legislation, but few extend this legislation to fight corruption alongside foreign authorities outside their territory. Brazil, incidentally, is in the second group of countries having such norms in its set of laws.

Even so, the existence of anti-corruption laws or even the existence of courts specialized in corruption (which is already a reality in many countries) is not enough. Effective monitoring and especially the enforcement of the law is crucial. Impunity stands as the worst example in the fight against corruption, in addition to the absence of specific norms and austere disciplinary measures.

At the end of 2022, the Transparency International, a leading non-governmental organization working globally to monitor the progress against corruption in each country, has published the report of a study regarding how countries are evolving in the enforcement of their anti-corruption laws abroad.

Unfortunately, the result was disappointing. Only two countries were identified with real progress in this regard: Switzerland and the USA. Of the 47 assessed countries, the degrees of progress identified are as follows:

Indeed, the report disclosed a significant reduction in the effort to fight corruption and in the inspection against foreign authorities in most countries. Although the COVID-19 pandemic has been an obstacle to progress in this regard, a downward trend was already being seen before its occurrence in 2020.

On the other hand, an advance in international standards was identified, as shown in the table below:

DOCUMENT/ENTITY

DEFINITION OF ADVANCES

OECD Anti-Bribery Recommendation adopted by the OECD Council in November 2021

– providing new reference norms that are already being used to assess countries.

– new sections on transparency of enforcement outcomes; steps to address the demand side of foreign bribery; enhancement of international cooperation; principles for the use of non-trial resolutions in foreign bribery cases; anti-corruption compliance by companies; and comprehensive protection for whistleblowers.

Political Declaration of the UN General Assembly – Special Session (UNGASS) against Corruption, adopted in June 2021

– criminalizing the bribery of foreign public officials and actively enforcing these measures by 2030, in support of achievement of the Agenda for Sustainable Development.

– strengthening the efforts to confiscate and return assets when using alternative legal mechanisms and non-trial resolutions in corruption proceedings with proceeds of crime for confiscation and return.

– allowing the recognition of other states harmed by an offense through judicial orders for compensation or damages.

– using the available tools for asset recovery and asset return, such as conviction-based and non-conviction-based confiscation

– striving to ensure that the return and disposal of confiscated property is done in a transparent and accountable manner.

– consider using confiscated proceeds of offenses to compensate the victims of crime, including through the social reuse of assets for the benefit of communities.

The study resulted in the following conclusions:

1. Enforcement continues to decline significantly.

2. No country is exempt from bribery by its nationals and related money laundering.

3. Inadequacies remain in legal frameworks and enforcement systems.

4. Most countries fail to publish adequate enforcement information.

5. Victims’ compensation is rare but there are a few positive developments.

6. International cooperation is increasing but still faces significant obstacles.

According to the table below, the difference in the number of investigated cases in the US and Switzerland compared to the other 45 countries in the study is striking:

Table 1: INVESTIGATIONS AND CASES (2018-2021)

Finally, Transparency International listed the following recommendations that should be observed to improve the enforcement of laws:

1. Address weaknesses in legal frameworks and enforcement systems, and give higher priority to enforcement against foreign bribery as well as related money-laundering offenses and accounting violation.

2. Ensure transparency of information on enforcement against foreign bribery.

3. Expand the OECD Working Group on Bribery’s (WGB) annual report on enforcement, and create a public database of foreign bribery investigations and cases.

4. Introduce victims’ compensation as a standard practice.

5. Closely monitor the use of non-trial resolutions.

6. Support stronger national systems for cross-border cooperation and explore the expansion of international structures.

Previous Post

There is no previous post

Back to all posts

Next Post

There is no next post

Back to all posts

RECENT POSTS

LINKEDIN FEED

Newsletter

Register your email and receive our updates

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA

Newsletter

Register your email and receive our updates-

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA

Licks Attorneys' Government Affairs & International Relations Blog

Doing Business in Brazil: Political and economic landscape

Licks Attorneys' COMPLIANCE Blog

Only the US and Switzerland effectively enforce their Anti-Corruption Laws Abroad

No items found.

Several countries have anti-corruption legislation, but few extend this legislation to fight corruption alongside foreign authorities outside their territory. Brazil, incidentally, is in the second group of countries having such norms in its set of laws.

Even so, the existence of anti-corruption laws or even the existence of courts specialized in corruption (which is already a reality in many countries) is not enough. Effective monitoring and especially the enforcement of the law is crucial. Impunity stands as the worst example in the fight against corruption, in addition to the absence of specific norms and austere disciplinary measures.

At the end of 2022, the Transparency International, a leading non-governmental organization working globally to monitor the progress against corruption in each country, has published the report of a study regarding how countries are evolving in the enforcement of their anti-corruption laws abroad.

Unfortunately, the result was disappointing. Only two countries were identified with real progress in this regard: Switzerland and the USA. Of the 47 assessed countries, the degrees of progress identified are as follows:

Indeed, the report disclosed a significant reduction in the effort to fight corruption and in the inspection against foreign authorities in most countries. Although the COVID-19 pandemic has been an obstacle to progress in this regard, a downward trend was already being seen before its occurrence in 2020.

On the other hand, an advance in international standards was identified, as shown in the table below:

DOCUMENT/ENTITY

DEFINITION OF ADVANCES

OECD Anti-Bribery Recommendation adopted by the OECD Council in November 2021

– providing new reference norms that are already being used to assess countries.

– new sections on transparency of enforcement outcomes; steps to address the demand side of foreign bribery; enhancement of international cooperation; principles for the use of non-trial resolutions in foreign bribery cases; anti-corruption compliance by companies; and comprehensive protection for whistleblowers.

Political Declaration of the UN General Assembly – Special Session (UNGASS) against Corruption, adopted in June 2021

– criminalizing the bribery of foreign public officials and actively enforcing these measures by 2030, in support of achievement of the Agenda for Sustainable Development.

– strengthening the efforts to confiscate and return assets when using alternative legal mechanisms and non-trial resolutions in corruption proceedings with proceeds of crime for confiscation and return.

– allowing the recognition of other states harmed by an offense through judicial orders for compensation or damages.

– using the available tools for asset recovery and asset return, such as conviction-based and non-conviction-based confiscation

– striving to ensure that the return and disposal of confiscated property is done in a transparent and accountable manner.

– consider using confiscated proceeds of offenses to compensate the victims of crime, including through the social reuse of assets for the benefit of communities.

The study resulted in the following conclusions:

1. Enforcement continues to decline significantly.

2. No country is exempt from bribery by its nationals and related money laundering.

3. Inadequacies remain in legal frameworks and enforcement systems.

4. Most countries fail to publish adequate enforcement information.

5. Victims’ compensation is rare but there are a few positive developments.

6. International cooperation is increasing but still faces significant obstacles.

According to the table below, the difference in the number of investigated cases in the US and Switzerland compared to the other 45 countries in the study is striking:

Table 1: INVESTIGATIONS AND CASES (2018-2021)

Finally, Transparency International listed the following recommendations that should be observed to improve the enforcement of laws:

1. Address weaknesses in legal frameworks and enforcement systems, and give higher priority to enforcement against foreign bribery as well as related money-laundering offenses and accounting violation.

2. Ensure transparency of information on enforcement against foreign bribery.

3. Expand the OECD Working Group on Bribery’s (WGB) annual report on enforcement, and create a public database of foreign bribery investigations and cases.

4. Introduce victims’ compensation as a standard practice.

5. Closely monitor the use of non-trial resolutions.

6. Support stronger national systems for cross-border cooperation and explore the expansion of international structures.

No items found.