The Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) of the People's Republic of China, which came into effect on November 1, 2021, represents a significant milestone in the global data privacy landscape. Considered China's most comprehensive data privacy legislation to date, the PIPL establishes a stringent set of rules for the processing of personal information. It aligns with global standards like the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) but incorporates characteristics and nuances specific to the Chinese context, reflecting the fundamental pillars of cyber sovereignty and national security.

The Brazilian Anti-Corruption Act (Law #12,846/2013) represents a fundamental milestone in Brazil's fight against corruption by establishing, among other provisions, the objective liability of legal entities for acts harmful to the public administration.

As reported by Veja magazine, the Uruguayan House of Representatives approved the Dignified Death Act on August 13, 2025, by a vote of 64 to 29, paving the way to legalize euthanasia in the country. The bill will now proceed to a vote in the Senate before it can take legal effect.

The global technological and geopolitical landscape has been rapidly evolving, highlighting a growing concern among nation states about protecting their strategic interests and economic sovereignty. Given this accelerating technological advancement and the critical importance of certain sectors to countries’ sustained growth, the United Kingdom – an open economy reliant on foreign investment – is no exception.

The US Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) announced in early December, according to The Wall Street Journal, record-breaking year for financial penalty collections in 2024.

One of the biggest concerns for parents in the modern world is their children's use of social media. Depending on how they are used, social media can become a huge headache for parents and their children tend to be the most vulnerable part in this unfiltered environment, where a world of discoveries is just a click away.

The No Surprises Act is a prime example of legislation in a country where the legal system is based more on case law than statutes. While Brazil’s legal system originates from Civil Law, the United States follows Common Law. However, U.S. laws are often very well-drafted, especially in terms of their applicability. In this context, it is important to consider the role of the judiciary, which operates under the punitive principle, unlike Brazil's compensatory system, which is less effective.

Since the Dodd-Frank Act was enacted in the United States in 2010, the role of whistleblowers has proven crucial in helping authorities prevent fraud, bribery, and other legal violations. This is because the government lacks the personnel and resources to efficiently monitor the market on its own.

A significant concern in the healthcare sector is the potential conflict of interest between the pharmaceutical and medical products industry and healthcare professionals, particularly physicians. This potential conflict arises from the unique nature of the relationship: while the industry’s end customer is the patient, it is the physician who decides which product the patient will use. At the same time, patients pay physicians to prescribe the best treatment for their well-being.

The First Panel of the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice unanimously decided, under the report of Justice Regina Helena Costa, in the appellate decision on Special Appeal #2035645/DF, that Anvisa (the Brazilian FDA) does not have the regulatory authority to restrict the commercial advertising of pharmaceuticals by companies. This applies especially when its regulatory actions contradict the provisions established in Law #9,294/1996 and other legislative acts.