One of the main reasons for seeking a attorney, when faced with a contract that will generate rights and obligations for the parties, is to seek the best advice to avoid various pitfalls, among them, the dreaded unfair terms, which can cause numerous problems for one of the contracting parties.
Definition of Unfair Term
But what is an unfair term?
An unfair term is a contractual provision that places one of the parties at an excessive or disproportionate disadvantage, contrary to the principles of good faith, equity and contractual balance.
It is important to highlight that unfair terms are most frequently seen in standard form contracts — a type of contract concluded by two parties, in which the rights, duties and conditions are established by the proponent, the adherent being unable to discuss or modify its content or being able to exercise this power only in a very limited way — and in consumer relations, where one of the parties, usually the consumer, has less negotiating power.
For a term to be considered unfair, it must:
- Contravene the principles of good faith and balance in contractual relationships.
- Impose an unreasonable disadvantage on one of the parties, especially on the consumer.
- Restrict fundamental rights, such as waiving legal guarantees or imposing disproportionate conditions.
• Who determines whether a Terms is Unfair?
The identification of an unfair term is not automatic and depends on a joint analysis of the context of the contract, the negotiation conditions and the parties involved.
Who can determine that a clause is abusive:
- A Judge: In the event of a legal dispute, a judge will analyze the contract and decide whether a term is unfair, based on current legislation and general principles of law, such as, for example, objective good faith and contractual balance. When declaring the nullity of an unfair term, the judge must maintain the other provisions of the contract valid, whenever possible.
- The Contracting Party: Although the judge is the final authority to declare a term unfair, the injured party (usually the consumer) can identify a potentially unfair term and request its review or annulment, either through a direct complaint to the supplier or through the courts. It is true that the contracting parties may also, before a legal dispute is instituted, negotiate the removal or modification of unfair terms.
- Consumer Protection Agencies: Entities such as Brazil’s Consumer Protection Office (PROCON) or the Brazilian Consumer Secretariat (SENACON) can also identify unfair terms in adhesion contracts and intervene to protect consumer rights, and may apply administrative sanctions to suppliers of goods or services that use such terms.
However, if there is a divergence of understanding, the judge ends up being the one who has the power to judge and declare a term as unfair in a legal proceeding.
Legal Basis for Identifying and Combating of Unfair Terms in Consumer Relations
The legal basis for identifying and canceling unfair terms in Brazil is found mainly in the Brazilian Consumer Protection Code (CDC), Law #8,078/1990.
The main provisions to help combat unfair terms are found in Articles 6, 39, 46, and 47 of the CDC, as set out below:
On the other hand, Article 51 of the CDC lists the types of clauses that would be considered abusive:
Legal Basis for Combating Unfair Terms in Contracts in General
Although unfair terms are initially associated with consumer relations (at least because the Consumer Protection Code is the only Brazilian law that contains a list of unfair terms, thus named, as described above), there are other contracts of different natures that present excessively disproportionate clauses, which can be even considered leonine, as they harm the contractual balance between the contracting parties.
Law #10,406/2022, better known as the Brazilian Civil Code, addresses the issue of unfair terms and contractual balance in several articles, which can be applied to contracts in general, including those that do not involve consumer relations or even consumers, but civil or commercial relations, involving individuals or legal entities. The following articles must be carefully observed by those responsible for analyzing a contractual instrument:
Legal Basis for Combating Unfair Terms in Free Competition
Another extremely important source for combating unfair terms, especially in contracts whose nature impacts free competition, is Article 36 of Law #12,529/2013, also known as the Antitrust Law, which defines as economic infractions, regardless of fault, acts in any form manifested, which have as their object or may produce the following effects, even if they are not achieved:
1. limit, distort or in any way harm free competition or free enterprise;
2. dominate the relevant market for goods or services;
3. arbitrarily increase profits; and
4. abusively exercise a dominant position.
Furthermore, the aforementioned legal provision lists the conduct that characterizes an infraction of the economic order, making it clear that if any other conduct characterizes one of the conditions described above, it will also be considered an infraction of the economic order:
1. agree, combine, manipulate or adjust with a competitor, in any form:
a) the prices of goods or services offered individually;
b) the production or marketing of a restricted or limited quantity of goods or the provision of a restricted or limited number, volume or frequency of services;
c) the division of parts or segments of a current or potential market for goods or services, by means of, among others, the distribution of customers, suppliers, regions or periods;
d) prices, conditions, advantages or abstention in public bidding;
2. promote, obtain or influence the adoption of uniform or concerted commercial conduct among competitors;
3. limit or prevent new companies from accessing the market;
4. create difficulties in the establishment, operation or development of a competing company or supplier, purchaser or financier of goods or services;
5. prevent competitors from accessing sources of inputs, raw materials, equipment or technology, as well as distribution channels;
6. demand or grant exclusivity for the dissemination of advertising in the mass media;
7. use deceptive means to cause third party prices to fluctuate;
8. regulate markets for goods or services, establishing agreements to limit or control research and technological development, the production of goods or the provision of services, or to hinder investments intended for the production of goods or services or their distribution;
9. impose, in the trade of goods or services, on distributors, retailers and representatives resale prices, discounts, payment terms, minimum or maximum quantities, profit margin or any other marketing conditions relating to their business with third parties;
10. discriminate against purchasers or suppliers of goods or services by means of differentiated pricing or operating conditions for the sale or provision of services;
11. refuse to sell goods or provide services, within the payment conditions normal to commercial customs and practices;
12. hinder or interrupt the continuity or development of indefinite-term commercial relations due to the other party's refusal to submit to unjustifiable or anti-competitive commercial clauses and conditions;
13. destroy, render useless or hoard raw materials, intermediate or finished products, as well as destroy, render useless or hinder the operation of equipment intended to produce, distribute or transport them;
14. hoard or prevent the exploitation of industrial or intellectual property rights or technology;
15. sell goods or providing services unjustifiably below cost price;
16. retain production or consumer goods, except to ensure coverage of production costs;
17. partially or totally cease the company's activities without proven legitimate cause;
18. making the sale of a good subject to the acquisition of another or the use of a service, or making the provision of a service subject to the use of another or the acquisition of a good; and
19. the abusive exercise or exploitation of industrial, intellectual, technology or trademark property rights.
What to do when faced with Unfair Terms?
When faced with unfair terms, it is recommended that the contracting party adopt the following measures:
1. Seek an amicable solution with the other contracting party, already taking a suggestion to modify the aforementioned clause, in order to seek contractual balance;
2. If the first step is unsuccessful and it is a consumer relationship, it is recommended that consumer protection and defense entities be sought;
3. If the second step is unsuccessful or if it is not a consumer relationship, it is recommended that the injured party seeks to defend their rights before the judiciary, so that the unfair term in question can be declared null and void by the judge.
It is important to remember that, if the unfair term is declared null and void, the remainder of the contract, as a rule, remains in full force; unless such clause is essential to its nature.